Archive for June, 2007

Jun 29 2007

Update: Live Net Radio Broadcast Today 4:00 p.m. ET

 UPDATE!!!:  Due to technical issues at our net radio host, TalkShoe.com, our show will be delayed about 30 minutes to 4:00 p.m. ET.


Dominoes Falling?  The past few weeks have presented us with more carnage in the wake of the credit bubble induced housing bubble. Two Bear Stearns hedge funds fell apart after suffering massive losses from mixing 10-15x leverage with sub-prime mortgage derivative debt. Merrill Lynch exited many of its related positions in CDOs / CMOs — and the valuations provided a grotesque look under the skirt of debt valuations.

Meanwhile, small broker dealer, Brookstreet Securities suffered massive losses in its reserves — heavily CMO related — resulting in massive margin calls that could not be met, and shortfalls in its SEC required reserves — forcing Brookstreet to shut its doors.

We’ll be discussing this and more of the usual on today’s show, hosted by TalkShoe. Click the ‘chime in’ link below to connect to our show!
Vigilant Investor Live 4:00 p.m. ET

Powered by TalkShoe

Listen. I.M. Chat. Call in.

Dial: 724-444-7444
Talkcast ID: 982

Register for free in advance (required for free chat) and receive personal call in pin #.
Or, for a one-time call in pin use: 222-333-4444

No responses yet

Jun 29 2007

The Millionaires’ Club Hits 9.5 Million — Big Deal?

If someone were to walk into the local gym and paint bigger numbers on the weights they lift, and then start boasting to everyone else about how much stronger they’d become, they’d immediately be laughed back to reality. But the financial news appears to not be as critical.  The news wires today are telling us — without really digging into why –  that the millionaires of the world increased by 8.3% in 2006,  up to about 9.5 million individuals estimated to have that much or more in financial assets, measured in U.S. dollars.

That’s not surprising given the amount of liquidity (expanding credit) flowing around the global system these days. Which begs the question, is the world really getting wealthier, or are these folks just the beneficiaries of asset inflation measured in the heavily expanded dollar? Well, given the global M3 numbers alone, we think it’s the latter. U.S. M3 continuations raise lots of concern:

sgs-m3-062907.gif

Let’s also not forget that U.S. M3 has increased by over 5 times since 1980.

Meanwhile, you can do a simple calculation on your own over at the Federal Reserve’s own CPI calculator site to find that $1 million today ain’t the $1 million of the Tycoon era.

gdmillions.jpg

Now, that’s merely adjusted to CPI! With CPI itself being a suspect stat given how it discounts food, energy and housing, the real adjustments are probably much worse.

All this is another reminder that those navigating these markets need to be exceptionally aware of what liquidity is doing to asset prices. In particular, investors need to be mindful that liquidity mixed into bubble psychology (which always grows blind to risk and reality) is a recipe for natural price relationships to grow very dislocated.

It’s been said the market is always right. But don’t forget, that’s often a concession to the reality that the market can remain irrational much longer than the average person can remain solvent betting against it. The question today on the minds of many on Wall Street is, what is the real value of over $ 1 trillion in mortgage backed derivatives given the Bear Stearns debacle? Given the vast amount of leverage supporting asset price trades, the same could be asked of most any asset price.

That said, anything you own today should be something you want to own five years from today in an economy that might be vastly different than what we perceive right now, and in an environment where the U.S. dollar commands far less respect, and interest rates are climbing in order to keep the heavily debt dependent U.S. economy above water.

And, as we have been saying for some time now, don’t just measure your returns in your local currency. Measure them in terms of exchange with other currencies, and especially in terms of hard assets. Can you buy more or less oil, gold, or gas than last year? More or less house? More or less health care or college? Then you will see your real rate of return. Since 2000, those returns year to year are not so good as we many think — and that’s a paradigm shift!

At any rate, if you’re new to the millionaires’ club — good for you — Better to have it than not!  Just keep it all in perspective, and don’t forget that you’re now also an even bigger taxing target!

No responses yet

Jun 28 2007

Interview on Market News First

Published by Johannes Ernharth under Live Net Radio, Video

If you’re near a computer at the moment, I will be interviewed on Market News First (www.MN1.com ) at 11:00 a.m. ET on Money Matters with Bob Leonard. We’ll be discussing what’s happened at Bear Stearns (the hedge fund melt down) and what that’s telling us about the economy & markets at the moment.

No responses yet

Jun 28 2007

Natural Gas Gambles & D.C.

Amaranth’s trading “caused wild price swings and socked consumers with high prices,” said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the panel. “It’s one thing when speculators gamble with their own money; it’s another when they turn U.S. energy natural gas) markets into a lottery.”

So says a politician whose done his fair share of messing with the economy in so many ways.

For example, it is Senator Levin’s Congress that continues to allow (and benefits from) laws that have created a fiat fractional reserve banking system in the U.S.  That’s the same system that served to provide the credit from nothing that Amaranth used to mess with gas prices prices to such extremes.  After all, Amaranth didn’t fall apart with trades backed fully by investor principle.  No sir!  These were leveraged trades that backfired, leaving the fund with pennies on the dollar as Amaranth was exposed on the wrong side of a big bet on natural gas prices.

No doubt  Amaranth made serious mistakes, but such  speculation among traders is a natural element of any market that is attempting to allocate resources.  The Amaranths of the world would never have the ability to create such craziness without the use of leverage — leverage invented from nothing given the nature of fractional reserve banking.

But don’t expect the Carl Levine’s of the U.S.  Congress to cut off their own golden goose — The same system of printing money from nothing provides the U.S. Congress with ready cash to cover shortfalls when tax raising is not politically viable or when the market balks at buying up official U.S. debt at the right rate.

Amaranth is guilty of blowing it, and nothing more.  Mr. Levin and crew on the Potomac are guilty of dishonest monetary policy that is slowly strangling the U.S. economy.  Remember that at election time.

No responses yet

Jun 27 2007

Dollar Foundation Continues Shaking

We’ve long worried about what will happen to the dollar and U.S. rates when the Yen Carry Trade is forced to be scaled back. When you borrow in the Yen as so many have to take advantage of the BOJ’s below market rate loans, and then convert into other currencies for investing, you’re certainly planning on a few assumptions. First, you don’t want the Yen to gain in strength, otherwise you’re cost to convert back and pay off your loan will erode your investment return in the other currency. Of course, when you initially converted into your new currency, you invested that money to get a decent rate of return. Initially conservative investments were the norm — borrowing for example yen at .25% a while back and investing in U.S. Treasuries at 5.0% — not a bad transaction, especially if you’re leveraged up 10 or 15 times.

However, all bets were not so conservative — especially in this era of newfangled alchemy finance, where junk rated debt was converted into CMO / CDO packages with AAA ratings from the major ratings agencies. Yes, those would be the same agencies with egg on their face in the wake of the Bear Stearns debacle unfolding. Their AAA ratings are now going out the window as various debt derivatives are being marked to market at 50 to 80 cents on the dollar, vs. marked to (computer) model, the later having justified unrealistic pricing despite there not being a tested liquid market for the assets or considering the consequences of a disorderly liquidation and valuation at market.

Granted, those models were not made by idiots — as Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) proved, even geniuses can operate in a dangerous vacuum of historic tendencies and averages. In our present environment, those models assumed the average environment over longer periods of time when measuring the risk associated with the ratings they were giving, failing to recognize as we do nearly every day here at Vigilant Investor –that, yes, now is different. We are in the midst of a giant money supply induced credit bubble that is nearing some tipping points, and perhaps some major ones, and at least some very inflationary ones for dollar holders.

Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Jun 27 2007

CDO Market Exposes Iceberg Beneath the Sub-Prime ‘Tip’

Published by Johannes Ernharth under Economy

Amazingly, College endowments are chasing the subprime debt being jettisoned from big Wall Street players. Reports the Wall Street Journal:

“There’s an opportunity out there to buy these loans at a discount,” says Lou Morrell, vice president for investments and treasurer at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, N.C. The university’s $1.2 billion endowment is in the process of placing about $25 million with a hedge fund to invest in subprime mortgages. Because these loans could sell for steep discounts, he says, “they will be popular with a lot of endowments out there.”

That seems crazy to us in the midst of other headlines (below) but that’s the nature of bubbles and their causes: Loose monetary and credit conditions enabled by central banks and fiat fractional reserve banking systems. Once said to be “contained” the sub-prime mess is being exposed as a leverage excess mess on Wall Street.

That said, we begin to ask, at what point do we cross over the tipping point, from the tip of the iceberg being noticed and dismissed, to when the full iceberg is finally being identified by everyone as such? Said another way, the mainstream is finally starting to identify the smoke they’ve been smelling since last December as a serious fire:

Bear Stearns May Put Up Less to Rescue Hedge Fund

Bear Stearns Cos. may put up $1.6 billion to rescue one of its money-losing hedge funds, half as much as it offered last week, according to two people with knowledge of the situation.

Another Bear Stearns fund may need bailout

Investment bank hopes to restructure hedge fund that made bad bets in repackaged subprime loans; firm’s shares sink more than 5 percent.

Bear Stearns not planning to bail out second fund

Bear Stearns Cos. Inc. (BSC.N: Quote, Profile, Research) is not currently planning to bail out a second hedge fund (the “the High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Fund”) that has suffered big losses, a source close to the matter said on Tuesday.

Cheyne Capital sells ‘risky’ securities

Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Jun 26 2007

Brookstreet: Credit Bubble Casualty

The iceberg beneath the sub-prime tip was further exposed this past week as Brookstreet Securities Corporation, a smaller broker dealer, which up until recently managed $571.6 billion of client money, has emerged as a casualty of the credit bubble. Doors were closed on Friday, June 22, after heavy losses in the Collateral Mortgage Obligation (CMO) market. 100 employees were laid off, 560 affiliated brokers were released and their clients forced to scramble to get their money.

Continue Reading »

2 responses so far

Jun 25 2007

Sub Prime Dominoes Fall: Hit Big Players in the Gut

Published by Johannes Ernharth under Economy

“No worries. It’s contained,” most experts on Wall Street said of the implosion in the Subprime market that kicked off just 6 months ago in December 2006. New Century Financial’s woes were the obvious consequences of reckless new kids on the block who began to believe their own B.S., it was said. Then, early this months a quiet article in the WSJ raised a small red flag, although it all seemed innocent enough.

Yet over the past two weeks nothing short of a bomb exploded upstream of the lowly subprime dealers and their clients when not one, but two Bear Stearns hedge funds dealing in various forms of alchemy-debt (where high default risk debt is carved up into payment streams and repackaged as AAA rated debt) imploded. (How ironic that one of the funds goes by the name “High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Fund.”) The worst news hit the wires by Thursday of this past week when it appeared billions of dollars of the securities would be marked to market in a desperate bid for liquidity. $1.6 billion of funds controlled around $25 billion of Collateral Debt Obligations (CDOs), a leverage of about 15 to 1.

Said Bloomberg of such prospects on June 21:

“A sale would give banks, brokerages and investors the one thing they want to avoid: a real price on the bonds in the fund that could serve as a benchmark. The securities are known as collateralized debt obligations, which exceed $1 trillion and comprise the fastest-growing part of the bond market.

Because there is little trading in the securities, prices may not reflect the highest rate of mortgage delinquencies in 13 years. An auction that confirms concerns that CDOs are overvalued may spark a chain reaction of writedowns that causes billions of dollars in losses for everyone from hedge funds to pension funds to foreign banks. Bear Stearns, the second-biggest mortgage bond underwriter, also is the biggest broker to hedge funds.”

The quote puts into perspective exactly the instability associated with sub primes, the most recent bubble beneficiary of central bank enabled credit and money supply expansion to crash under its own, impossible weight.

Too biased and talking down the economy, you say?? Nouriel Roubini over at RGE summed it up this way:

…these highly illiquid securities have been priced so far based on unrealistic and distorted credit ratings as the rating industry has been complicit with the mispricing and misrating of these securities: most of these securities have not been re-rated in a way consistent with the rising default rates on subprime mortgages. That is why Wall Street is now in a panic about getting true market values – through an auction - of such securities. Losses for CDOs investors will be massive once these assets are correctly priced to market rather than kept on books based on valuation that do not make any sense as they were based on distorted and obsolete ratings.

Regular readers are all too familiar that this was coming down the pike in some form or another. That’s what happens when you transfer tremendous wealth out of the hands of those who back the dollars they spend with actual production as the byproduct of savings and effort, vs. those who gain purchasing power by sacrificing nothing and merely printing fresh currency out of thin air. The latter is the banking system, which transferred those freshly minted dollars — and the purchasing power they gained at the expense of those who contribute to the economy — and ginned them into the credit system and into the hands of those who couldn’t buy up enough of the securities that are now falling apart in front of our eyes.

And now mainstream journalists are catching up to the fact that this is very likely to spread to Main Street as more dominoes fall. It may well be that the markets actions last week are signaling, finally, that the mainstream is starting to question if all that smoke actually means there is a fire.

While the scramble is on to bail out what’s left (although Merrill came up well short of hopes on Thursday) of the two funds, the carnage is clear and spreading. MBIA is now being exposed as another mainstream casualty — a blow up at the major CDO insurer (billions of dollars of guarantees) will only send more ripples through the markets. Also on the hook as lenders are Goldman Sachs (GS), JP Morgan Chase (JPM), Bank of America (BAC), Citigroup (C), Lehman (LEH), and Barclays (BCS).

The dominoes are set for a few big players to burn their fingers. At that level of the game, you’re in the business of playing with others money — and often that which is minted from nothing. No doubt these banks will survive under any circumstance since it will always be argued that without them the U.S. economy will vaporize. As such, any hardship will merely contribute to the vast expansion of money supply flooding the markets.

At what point do the ripples turn into the credit bubble tsunami backlash that many have warned about for several decades? Let it suffice to say, a bloating money supply always results in mispriced assets of all sorts. Once that’s understood to be the real problem we’re dealing with, and not just in sub prime derivatives, well.. the cat’s out of the bag, and then look out!

No responses yet

Jun 23 2007

Father of Climatology: Global Warming Fearmongering a bunch of ‘hooey’

Published by Johannes Ernharth under Economy

Reid Bryson, a University of Wisconsin-Madison professor emeritus known as the father of scientific climatology, is not skeptical that global warming exists, he is just doubtful that humans are the cause of it.

“There is no credible evidence that (global warming) is due to mankind and carbon dioxide. We’ve been coming out of a Little Ice Age for 300 years. We have not been making very much carbon dioxide for 300 years. It’s been warming up for a long time,” says Bryson .

Do Humans have an effect? “It’s like there is an elephant charging in and you worry about the fact that there is a fly sitting on its head. It’s just a total misplacement of emphasis…. It really isn’t science because there’s no really good scientific evidence,” says Bryson.

Asked The Capital Times from Madison, WI:

So, if global warming isn’t such a burning issue, why are thousands of scientists so concerned about it?

“Why are so many thousands not concerned about it?” Bryson shot back.

“There is a lot of money to be made in this,” he added. “If you want to be an eminent scientist you have to have a lot of grad students and a lot of grants. You can’t get grants unless you say, ‘Oh global warming, yes, yes, carbon dioxide.’”

Speaking out against global warming is like being a heretic, Bryson noted.

Well…

Bryson said he recently wrote something on the subject and two graduate students told him he was wrong, citing research done by one of their professors. That professor, Bryson noted, is probably the student of one of his students.

“Well, that professor happened to be wrong,” he said.

“There is very little truth to what is being said and an awful lot of religion. It’s almost a religion. Where you have to believe in anthropogenic (or man-made) global warming or else you are nuts.”

Noted one expert critic of Bryson, “If you saw smoke in your house, it would be irresponsible not to get your family out, right?”

Well, yes. But, then again, we’d not rush to expend valuable resources to put out a fire unless we were sure the house was actually on fire. Especially when tens of billions of deals are to be made by those politically connected enough to provide the solutions.

No responses yet

Jun 21 2007

Greenspan and China’s U.S. Holdings

Published by Johannes Ernharth under Economy

So, last week Dr. Bubbles, Alan Greenspan, says we don’t have to worry about China dumping our treasuries, which would sink the debt dependent U.S. economy under high rates and a lack of liquidity. That’s good!

But then he explains why: China won’t have anyone to sell the securities to.

That’s bad.

Regarding the often cited global liquidity boom driving asset prices and dating back to the Cold War?

“Enjoy it while it lasts.”

Hmm. How comforting, G-man.

Nonetheless, the question is somewhat of a Straw Man. The problem is not if China will dump all of its U.S. Treasuries; really, that’s an extreme. Rather, the more rational question is, will China back-off its recent torrid pace of accumulation? And, will it begin liquidating some of its existing holdings?

With the U.S. requiring nearly $2.5 a day to meet its deficit short-falls, inquiring minds should be worrying. The U.S. private and public sector refinanced and leveraged up about all it could at generational-low interest rates. These were gifted by their trading partners, desperate to hold their currencies in line with the U.S. dollar so to not lose trade. This was a subsidy of short, given those foreign nation’s consumers would have otherwise gained purchasing power in their local currencies had their governments not inflated away that purchasing power to maintain parity with the dollar.

With the U.S. consumer slowing down and the U.S. economy being lead into recession by a decelerating housing market, more foreign nations will have to weigh the costs of supporting the currency of the world’s largest debtor.
Thanks for the memories, Alan. And especially for ginning up M3 and Credit into the stratosphere during your tenure so we have bubble based economies and the requisite collapses that follow.

No responses yet

Jun 20 2007

‘Coming Credit Meltdown’ Goes Mainstream?

The Wall Street Journal today published and Op Ed from Seve Ratner with the ominous title “The Coming Credit Meltdown”. Echoing worries was PIMCO’s Bill Gross.

Gross’ comments and Ratner’s editorial were the subject of discussion on CNBC on Tuesday, June 19, 2007.

This is the real deal, folks. Never before has so much depended on cheap and loose credit availability. The ongoing problems of the sub-prime blowout — round one of the credit-unwind — are still showing up. Bear Stearns — an investment banking firm dating back to the early 1920s — has emerged as one its casualties, while Goldman took a shot as well:

And the consequences to housing will continue to show up, further affecting the economy negatively:

The dirty secret of bubbles and their causes — official policy that allows for ginned up credit and money supply — is that they encourage, and temporarily support, bad business decisions, leaving many hanging out on the limb in the rush to be part of the deal-making. The cleanup phase is the painful part, but necessary nonetheless. Attempting to wash away the problems with more of what caused the problems only punts a bigger problem into the future.

Here’s another link to the WSJ op ed piece., although we don’t know how long it will last.

No responses yet

Jun 20 2007

Housing Signals What Americans are Feeling About Economy

A few articles we came across today…

No responses yet

Jun 19 2007

No Free Lunch With the Dollar Glut

We’re big fans of Bill Fleckenstein and provide the following three pieces as “essential reading” for providing perspective on the global macro / geo political environment supporting present market valuations.   We recommend you read with a glass of wine.  As always, start from the oldest (bottom) and read up to today.

No responses yet

Jun 18 2007

Asset Price Inflation is Still Inflation, Rot and All

Published by Johannes Ernharth under Economy

Global inflation of the money supply goes by another name on Wall Street: Liquidity. Yet, when money supply expands through our banking system, we should be well reminded that it does so without sacrifice or work — contributing nothing to an economy except claims to existing wealth. That is, after all, what a currency is backed by: the currency-issuing citizens’ existing wealth. (Or, in the case of a global currency like the dollar, it is backed by the wealth of anyone storing their wealth in dollars!)

Compare the banker who profits by printing something from nothing to a hard working contributor to an economy, such as a baker. Our baker scrimps and saves over time to buy an oven and the necessary ingredients for making bread, and he then must invest his own time and labor to create, lets say, 100 loves of bread. By exchanging each loaf for $2.00 at his baker, he can earn $200. While each dollar is nothing more than a slip of paper that can be used to buy other things, what it really represents is the baker’s hard work and savings (e.g., it is “backed” by his labor and forgone consumption).

In the end, because of the baker’s contribution, the world is 100 loaves of bread wealthier, while the baker is pleased to have $200 of claims that can be easily exchanged in the economy for other goods and services. That’s important to understand about productive contributions to an economy: Each of the baker’s $200 are really true savings — they simply represent the sacrifice and effort of the baker, and in an honest economy example as such, they are honest claims to other’s wealth. Some of it will be reinvested into his bakery, and the rest will be used for personal consumption. Regardless, because they are backed by concrete savings and production, the economy is better off with the baker’s coincidental contributions to growing the economy.
Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Jun 15 2007

Vigilant Investor Live! We’re on!

Contrary to our announcement during last week’s show, we’re on today. (Next week we’ll be on hiatus). So tune in.

Listen to our live Streamcast today from 3:30 - 4:30 p.m. We’ll be covering:

  • Why the Job Drain: Explanations for the off-shoring phenomenon
  • Congress Acting Up: Economic Illiterates or Vote Pandering?
  • Trouble brewing in the Eid East (yes, more, if you can imagine…)
  • And more!

·

Don’t forget to subscribe to our podcast. Listen at your convenience. Use iTunes and your iPod (or other MP3 Players)

No responses yet

Next »