Archive for March, 2008

Mar 26 2008

Your Money Backs More Bad Debt

Regulators “are playing with fire,” said Allan Meltzer, a Fed historian and economics professor at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. “With good luck, none of these liabilities will come due. We can’t expect that good luck, and we haven’t had it.”
– Bloomberg (March 26, 2008)

The reason you want solid collateral to secure a loan is obvious. You want to protect adequately against the borrower’s potential inability to pay you the loan back. How interesting that the Fed is taking 30 $ Billion of illiquid mortgage securities as collateral from otherwise insolvent Bear Stearns to bail the Wall Street firm out. As intriguing (alarming) — is the Treasury’s encouragement of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to buy more mortgage-backed bonds.

We ask — who in their right mind would lend out their own money backed by such risky collateral? Who today would buy mortgage backed bonds with their own money?

Ah, there lies the rub! It’s not their money which backs these shenanigans – it yours!

No responses yet

Mar 21 2008

Bailout Junkies

We’ve continually warned about the bailout addicted U.S. Another voice of clarity and reason all along has been Bill Fleckenstein. As usual, he nails it in his latest commentary, “Catering to the Bailout Nation.” BTW, Bill’s recently released book Greenspan’s Bubbles: The Age of Ignorance at the Federal Reserve – is definitely worth a read! We wonder — has anyone ever been un-knighted? Can they do that?

Any reasonable person knows that bailouts beget more (and larger) bailouts. Like a drunk having another drink, it’s just going to make the hangover (and resulting inflation) even worse.

Also, ask yourself this one – why are big Wall Street banks getting bailed out (with taxpayer money) – when the 5 largest recently paid themselves 39 $Billion in bonuses?

Think long and hard about the answer to that one – because you are paying for it – in overt taxes, and the great hidden tax – accelerating real inflation.

No responses yet

Mar 18 2008

The “Big Rip-Off” continues…

With today’s 75 basis point rate cut – we see continued evidence as to whom the Fed really serves. As we have long said, it’s not you and I – it’s the Big Wall Street Banks. The “Big Rip-Off” of your savings continues. Jon Markman gets right down to it…

No responses yet

Mar 18 2008

The Perils of False Paradigms III

Published by Johannes Ernharth under Economy

That was on March 11, just a few days go when Bear Stearns was trading on the close at $62.97… Cramer has since clarified he wasn’t talking about the stock, but rather those with money in the bank, so to speak. But this wasn’t the first time:

“This is a liquidity issue, not a credit issue… If you panic out of Goldman, Bear Stearns, and Lehman right now… you’re an idiot!”

That’s from Mad Money on June 22, 2007 when Goldman closed at 222.40, Bear at 143.75, and Lehman at 76.62. Earlier this January Bear traded up around $136.

“Nobody saw this coming.”

That’s a refrain we keep hearing from the Wall Street apologist crowd, who are just as quick to blame investor’s irrational fears for what’s transpiring. Regular readers here at Vigilant Investor, of course, knew full well the storm was coming and that it would take down housing and mortgage markets, and bleed into the rest of the credit markets. Our readers also knew things were only in their infancy last summer when many a popular pundit given air time suggested the worst had already passed. Our readers also knew to discount many of the same financial punditocracy who proclaimed the bottom was reached in the Fall, and then earlier this Winter. You also know we think this still has a very long way to go.Well, with Cramer’s thoughts above, we though this was a primary example of sloppy thinking. Actually, the problem with the thinking is not that it is necessarily sloppy, but that it is clouded by the illusion of knowledge. Too many in contemporary finance have come to believe in the fantasy of a false paradigm; a paradigm whose foundations are now exposed as having been built on sand.That’s not to say that many of the rules that governed this paradigm didn’t have some relevancy, but they were still, nonetheless, subject to the general theory of relativity.
E=MC

If you’ve been schooled in layman’s relativity, you’ve come to understand Albert Einstein’s initial, rudimentary point that what someone sees and experiences as a passenger on a train is far different from what another person experiences standing next to the track as that same train passes by. A passenger tossing a ball inside the train experiences a ball that goes up and down into his hand, while the person alongside the track watches as person and ball blaze past at 50 mph. Meanwhile, the person in the train sees the hillside across the valley slowly move from one side of his field of vision to the other, yet for the stationary track side viewer, the hillside is set firmly where it is.

An analogy can be made to what’s happened to the many folks on Wall Street and around the world who are currently suffering from the effects of The Great Credit Bubble Collapse of 2007-2012. As author Daniel Boorstin observed in his book The Discoverers, the greatest obstacle to realizing the earth was round and the oceans lead to other continents was not ignorance, it was the illusion of knowledge. From the perspective of those knee deep in the now collapsing world of contemporary finance, from their seat in the train, so to speak, all their rules of their environment worked perfectly and for many years. There sense of the rules of finance were as believable to them as the rules of geocentricism was to the most learned Kings, courts and Clergy prior to Copernicus. Today’s false premise crafted rules that believed players could keep building up asset values using more and more expanded credit, and the economy could tolerate more debt and money inflation than many critics ever imagined possible. When a business cycle would run into problems, invariably the Fed could pull the nose up on the economy and get things going again without too much pain, and a good solid injection of more debt and liquidity. Sometimes there were blowups, but the Fed always stepped up to the rescue.

Meanwhile, major players from investment banking to hedge funds and private equity firms all mastered riding these business cycles, and it was for a moment as if risk had entirely been removed from the market place. The laws of the paradigm proved to them anything was possible.

Well, at least from the perspective relative to passengers riding the wild train of contemporary finance. The problem is, the set of rules governing their relativity were subservient to the greater laws of economic gravity. Indeed, a nation cannot consume itself to riches, nor can it indebt itself unproductively to permanent economic growth. Yet it was on that foundation that Greenspan, Bernanke and most of Wall Street and Washington D.C. have operated. That’s a recipe for disaster, and it should come as no surprise that any structure built on such a flimsy foundation would be a house of cards ready to drop.

No responses yet

Mar 17 2008

How Ugly? Great Depression Ugly!

A list of articles worth perusing to grasp the depth of our problems:

No responses yet

Mar 17 2008

Greenspan’s Latest Attempt at Handwringing: A Point by Point Critique

Seems like Sir Al can’t try hard enough to absolve himself from the monster he created with the tools available via The Creature From Jekyll Island. Here are our thoughts on Honest Al’s latest comments.

We will never have a perfect model of risk
(By Alan ‘Master of obvious” Greenspan)

The current financial crisis in the US is likely to be judged in retrospect as the most wrenching since the end of the second world war. It will end eventually when home prices stabilise and with them the value of equity in homes supporting troubled mortgage securities.

Since World War II? Try since the Great Depression. This situation is as if 1930 met 1973 and used a fertility clinic to produce sextuplets.

Home price stabilisation will restore much-needed clarity to the marketplace because losses will be realised rather than prospective.

It will, however, not restore clarity to Sir Al’s amorphous use of the English language to convey something without really saying anything. Look, the pricing mechanism has been so badly distorted — and not just in housing — it’ll take a substantial cleansing to restore any sense of rational order. The Fed’s meddling will do nothing but continue to subsidize the fantasy that is “price” across many asset classes, housing included. Al should know this.

The major source of contagion will be removed.

How so? By propping up prices artificially as is being done as we speak?

Financial institutions will then recapitalise or go out of business.

With whose wealth? With wealth confiscated from dollar holders via every more inflationary credit expansion!

Trust in the solvency of remaining counterparties will be gradually restored and issuance of loans and securities will slowly return to normal. Although inventories of vacant single-family homes - those belonging to builders and investors - have recently peaked, until liquidation of these inventories proceeds in earnest, the level at which home prices will stabilise remains problematic.

Trust may be restored, but that’s badly placed trust if it is through yet another bailout. As for home prices, any price stabilization that comes from bailout is merely fantasy stabilization. With the Fed fixing the price of money, we’ll — expect as many dislocations as you would from some arbitrary panel fixing the price of Corn, gas, or anything else. But this is at the heart of the central planning meddlers in the Fed and Treasury (and their many supporters), who trust price fixing well ahead of free market allocation of scarce resources, some out of misguided economic beliefs, but as many if not more out of being directly enriched by being able to tap into the Fed printing press and create massive personal profits form the privileged.

The American housing bubble peaked in early 2006, followed by an abrupt and rapid retreat over the past two years. Since summer 2006, hundreds of thousands of homeowners, many forced by foreclosure, have moved out of single-family homes into rental housing, creating an excess of approximately 600,000 vacant, largely investor-owned single-family units for sale. Homebuilders caught by the market’s rapid contraction have involuntarily added an additional 200,000 newly built homes to the “empty-house-for-sale” market.

Uhh… Al? How nice of you to comment from the sidelines as if you weren’t the head cheerleader behind this mess? Homeowners were lured in by none other than You, pal. You told everyone that housing was not in a bubble, and denied being able to rationally indentify one even if it was beating you over the head with a lead pipe. You were the one that suggested ARMs were a good way for consumers to go. You were the one encouraging everyone to help the economy by borrowing and consuming more and more.

Home prices have been receding rapidly under the weight of this inventory overhang.

Created by the artificial oversupply of easy mortgage credit, created by YOUR POLICIES!

Single-family housing starts have declined by 60 per cent since early 2006, but have only recently fallen below single-family home demand.

Continue Reading »

One response so far

Mar 17 2008

Bear Stearns Bailout Kicks Off Another Crazy Week for the Economy

Published by Johannes Ernharth under Economy

It began last summer with the implosion of two subprime oriented hedge funds, one leveraged 15 times, the other 10 times. In the end, investors of the 10x fund received about 9 cents on the dollar, while the 15x was wiped-out altogether. Today it comes as no surprise that the rumors were true: Bear Stearns was on the brink of collapse, and never mind that CEO Alan Schwartz asserted the rumors themselves caused the collapse. The once venerable institution was doomed. The seeds were sown, just as they are for many other institutions as the Great Credit Bubble — and the false paradigm sloppy thinking it engendered in so many players — continues to unwind.

As such, the Fed — having been, since its founding, in the “game of bailout” in order to preserve the obscene profits made by member firms on the back of many prior credit and monetary inflations — will bail out Bear Stearns, along with the sham front of JP Morgan Chase & Co., whose risk will once again be backed up by the Fed’s ability to print money out of thin air. The buying price — About $2.00 a share, which was the only alternative to going bust - is almost criminal, and harks back to a day when banking cartels would collude to create booms and busts by expanding and then rapidly contracting money supply to buy for pennies on the dollar overextended business projects that were lured into action by the sharply curtailed inflation. Indeed, it is like we’re watching history all over again. Reports the WSJ:

To help facilitate the deal, the Federal Reserve is taking the extraordinary step of providing as much as $30 billion in financing for Bear Stearns’s less-liquid assets, such as mortgage securities that the firm has been unable to sell, in what is believed to be the largest Fed advance on record to a single company. Fed officials wouldn’t describe the exact financing terms or assets involved. But if those assets decline in value, the Fed would bear any loss, not J.P. Morgan.

Once again the secrecy prevails on what’s being functionally financed out of all dollar holder’s pockets. Truly, everyone in the United States should be up in arms with what the Fed has unilaterally done with their own purchasing power, yet the silence is nearly deafening. What a great game to be in if you have few scruples about profiting from what in any sense of the word is nothing more than legalized counterfeiting.

But foreigners are not so indifferently stupid. Reports the Telegraph in Britain, “Foreign investors veto Fed rescue“, where Business Editor, Abrose Evans-Pritchard, comments:

” Asian, Mid East and European investors stood aside at last week’s auction of 10-year US Treasury notes. “It was a disaster,” said Ray Attrill from 4castweb. “We may be close to the point where the uglier consequences of benign neglect towards the currency are revealed.”

The share of foreign buyers (”indirect bidders”) plummeted to 5.8pc, from an average 25pc over the last eight weeks. On the Richter Scale of unfolding dramas, this matches the death of Bear Stearns.

Rightly or wrongly, a view has taken hold that Washington is cynically debasing the coinage, hoping to export its day of reckoning through beggar-thy-neighbour policies.”

So the Fed’s response has been to further cut rates by .25% to 3.25%, meaning they’re working on greasing the liquidity skids: Hello more money and cheap credit out of thin air! Not surprisingly the dollar is in a tailspin vs. hard assets such as oil and gold.
But what’s amazing is that so many still fail to fully comprehend the calamity at hand. Consider this headline from Reuters:

Despite Fed action? The article at that Reuters headline has since disappered, but the message tells volume: What should folks be expecting for the d

Meanwhile, the Great Bubbler himself, Alan Greenspan, continues to inject his opinions into the mix as if his own policies were not the seeds that grew into this current crisis. We’ll comment on that blather in another post.

Readers should not forget that right now reality and “official stamps of approval” — such as ratings from the major agencies like S&P and Moody’s are not one and the same, and the market knows this all to well, hence the lockups experienced in the Muni Bond market and the multiple examples of BS being called on the entire mortgage financing market, which is now bleeding heavily in the credit default swap (CDS) derivatives market.

Shoes still to drop:

  • Credit Default Swaps: In fact the entire mega $ trillion derivatives market is in danger from cascading defaults as corporate debt default rates will, in our opinion, undoubtedly rise far more than most contemporary finance “experts.”

As an aside, we’ve been criticized for using quotes around “experts” in the past, so let me explain why we’ve been doing this for years: This “expert” crowd has exhibited a constant expertise at being 1) absolutely blindsided by events since the initial (and largely ignored) shot across the bow at the end of February 2007, and these same “experts” 2) failed miserably at interpreting what they were experiencing. After all, how many times over the last 12 months do you have to hear “this will blow over” / “remain contained” / “the worst has past us already,” or “financial stocks are irrationally bargain priced — we can’t buy enough,” before you came to the conclusion these “experts” have absolutely no idea what’s caused this problem?”

But I digress: For the same sloppy thinking reasons that mortgage backed securities have been the epicenter of this calamity, similar risk indifference and risk taking permeated the corporate debt market. Much of that risk is insured with CDS instruments. CDSs are the equivalent of you or me buying life (or any other type of insurance) from an insurance company with zero cash reserves required to be set aside to back up their insured risk obligations. In other words, CDS investors better hope their bets are not so correct that their CDS counterparties cannot afford to come up with the required payment to cover the insured loss! Unfortunately, risk was so mispriced over the last few years, we can’t fathom any way that CDS risks will not take a terrible toll as guarantors default on their obligations, and the loss-related consequences cascade throughout the marketplace.

  • Commercial and Retail Real Estate: We’ve written about this a lot over the last year. There’s little doubt in our mind that the easy credit conditions created a oversupply of both retail and commercial real estate, with ever more space designed to accommodate an economy basking in the temporary, artificially induced glow of easy credit and expanding money supply. Now that the tide is receding, the consumer is being exposed as woefully over indebted with many to the point of insolvency. More money supply will not solve this problem, it’ll only make it worse. Expect assets backing these projects to suffer badly and play into the CDS mess noted above.
  • Foreigners will finally lose all taste for financing U.S. profligacy and abuse of the dollar.

Hold on to your hats, people. As we’ve been saying, this is only just starting to get interesting. Hurricane Credit Bubble Bust has just started to hit our shores with the early wisps of wind and rain. Much worse lies ahead, and don’t be faked out by the eye of the storm that’ll induce many into the calm. That eye will be the byproduct of the majority still buying into the false paradigm that is collapsing around them. When it comes to the economy, it is in many ways a democracy and if enough players buy into the belief that Liquidity and expanding credit can actually solve the problem, that collective belief in action can actually provide some temporary ballast to an economy. But economic gravity will rule the day and catch up with the free lunch policy crowd. After all, its not really that complicated:

  • You can’t get rich by overly-indebting yourself, especially with unproductive debt that hangs like an anchor around the economy’s neck as we all struggle to stay above water. The legacy of that debt is what’s catching up with us.
  • You can’t spend you way to riches, never mind what the sloppy thinking big-wigs of contemporary finance say. Consumption — the holy grail of policy makers economic thinking — is a one way ticket to putting the cart before the horse.
  • You’ll have a harder and harder time funding your deficits by pledging as collateral overpriced assets (thanks to all that inflation) whose values foreigners are growing increasingly skeptical about.

Such simple truths criticizing the conventional free lunch mentality may seem like common sense to you if you’re here reading this, but common sense never got in the way of academicians like Ben Bernanke and his meddling predecessors who love testing their Ivory Tower theories in our real time economy, or in the way of those who feed from the highly profitable trough created by policy actions inherent to what such central planning theory supports. The naturally productive economy is very tolerant, and can stay afloat a very long time riding on the the good reputation of U.S. strength. But that’s about to be blown out of the water as the 37 year experiment of unbacked fiat currency comes to a calamitous end.

Stay vigilant and make sure to Think it Through!

No responses yet

Mar 14 2008

Sir Alan Greenspan’s Image Rusting Away

Published by Johannes Ernharth under Economy

 ”In retrospect, it’s easy to see how we got into this mess: Easy money fueled a stock-market bubble and, after that popped, more easy money saved the day, stoking a real-estate frenzy that crashed in surging U.S. home-loan defaults and losses exceeding $188 billion at banks and securities firms.

Hindsight is 20/20 not just for the masses, but also for those riding the crest of waves generated by the massive credit expansion engineered by by Alan Greenspan and then inherited and perpetuated by Ben Bernanke.  That includes plenty of pros who are now losing billions — and once again holding their hands out for Fed largess (read dollar holder rip-off) in the form of various bailouts, ala the folks over at Bear Stearns.

The above quote is from a Bloomberger review of Greenspan’s Bubbles: The Age of Ignorance at the Federal Reserve, from Bill Fleckenstein and Fred Sheehan.    Sheehan and Fleckenstein expose the fraud.  Give it a read.

No responses yet

Mar 07 2008

Super Genius Hedge Funds Dropping Like Flies

Well… Hedge funds were supposed to be the super geniuses for the mega rich… and then downward they trickled to the filthy rich, and then the super rich, and eventually the rich, the neveau riche and the Me-Tooue Riche.  Well, we said last summer when Bear Stearns blew up that none of these super geniuses were getting it, and we’ve been saying that before and since. Just read our archives and don’t buy that “nobody saw it coming” rubbish because that’s a half-assed excuse for neglect, hubris, vast volumes of conceit (at those pointing out this inevitability) and downright greed. So here we are.

At what point the conventional wisdom shifts in this country to comprehend how severe the U.S. and Global economic situation is is unknown to us. Until then, read the cards: You can weep, or you can play ‘em right. Your Choice.

In the meantime, all those who jollied around using the contemptuous term “tin foil hat wearing crowd” when describing publications like ours… Well, we hope you’ve not gone and just lost your shirt. Good luck at exiting your trades.

As for their victims… So very sorry… You could have listened.  Will you learn?

Think. Don’t Sink.

No responses yet

Mar 06 2008

Things Turn Ugly for U.S. Consumers

We’ve been exceptionally busy with our real careers (that don’t involve writing) which you can imagine is keeping us from doing as much writing given what’s transpiring in the economy and markets as we speak.

What?  You haven’t heard?   Well, here’s a list.  And for those of you looking for answers, please just leaf back through the past few months of our writing and you’ll have a good idea of not only what, but why this is happening — as well as some serious insight about vigilant thinking for your future.  If you can’t take the time to investigate, well… You have only one other choice!

That said, here’s our list of current crisis points, victims, et. al. with some occasional commentary:

U.S. Unexpectedly Lost 63,000 Jobs in February - Bloomberg (03/07/2008 07:45 AM)

This should come as no surprise to anyone.   The job numbers, while rigged to carry momentum on the upside long after prior real job growth dissipates, eventually fall under the weight of the prevailing trend.  Our trend is hardly filled with light winds:  housing, the primary driving sector of the pre bubble break economy, has been jettisoning jobs faster than a drug runner dumps his stash when pursued by the Feds.  Those figures have simply not been getting a real voice, while at the same time the essence of the unemployment stat is also somewhat fictitious.  What do you call someone of able body and mind who does not have a job?  Well, if he’s not looking for work, he’s not unemployed — he’s “discouraged.”  Real unemployment by the standards used back when stats were less fiddled with (e.g. during the depression when unemployment was 25%) is closer to 13%.  Expect that to worsen.

Consumers can only go on for so long before they buckle.   That’s a problem when you’re economic policy is built on the foundation of sand that is consumption rather than savings.   So many other shoes are readying to drop. Look out. Be careful.

2 responses so far