Archive for the 'Gas Prices' Category

Jul 31 2008

U.S. Tresuries are Eventually a Sucker’s Bet

We’ll, we’ve talked about it for years here on Vigilant Investor.   Your chief editor here has referred to it in annual reports to clients in his private consulting practice:  When honestly looked at the U.S. fiscal situation implies inevitable, long-term insolvency.

I don’t come to this conclusion lightly, although I’m reminded of it by reading that President Bush has signed the bill allowing for the Freddie and Fannie bailout to go forward, which includes the debt ceiling being raised to $10.62 trillion.  Yes, with a T.

Now, we’ve pointed out the sleight of hand that goes on with reporting deficits in the United States. This leads most of the sheep to accept at face value that the official federal deficit hovers around $200-300 billion each year.  Granted, that’s no song, but the reality is far higher when you actually account for all the obligations decades of Congressional profligacy has chained to the U.S. taxpayers’ backs.

The whole number is over $54 trillion - some $175,000 per living person in the United States — once you actually stop with the facade that the obligations of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are somehow not worthy of being included on the balance sheet.  Broken down to a net present value of future obligations figure, we’re talking an annual deficit number closer to $4.6 trillion, a gargantuan figure that keeps building each year politicians pretend it really does not  exist because doing so will only scare the electorate.  That’s because fixing the problem will require draconian cuts and tax increases; although tax increases of the levels required to make a difference won’t work since they’ll only strangle what little economic growth is going on at the moment, further reducing revenues.

But, alas!  When it comes to politicians, they do have another “out” that can maybe work for another election or two: inflation!  By inflation, I don’t mean rising prices, but rather the cause of the rising prices: increasing money supply.    This is the easiest way for politicians to pay down the promises they and their predecessors have made, and in case you have not yet noticed, it’s been coming to a gas pump and grocery check out near you for a number of years now.  Heck, when you can print money and your official department of statistics filled with lackeys looking to keep the guys controlling their salaries happy, we’ll…  This might explain why Social Security recipients received an unconscionable 2.7% raise for their 2008 payments when the price of eggs, milk, and flour are climbing at well over 10 times that pace!

Continue Reading »

One response so far

Jun 10 2008

Geopolitical Update: Saber Rattling Amuck!

We should privatize the sanctions against Iran by launching a worldwide divestment campaign.

–Senator John McCain, the Republican nominee for the presidency.

Military and economic Sabre rattling is the order of the day.  As if prices are not already distorted enough, the thought of another war in Iran should concern all vigilant investors!

On the issue of war with Iran, consider Jimb Lobe’s observations on its possibility.  Also, consider Llew Rockwell’s piece on the relationship between War and Inflation.

Do we have an opinion on should there be a war with Iran, or no war? Indeed, we do, but that does not matter. What matters is that readers consider what each alternative means to them in how they handle there own affairs.

No responses yet

Jun 01 2008

Waters Suggests Nationalizing U.S. Oil Companies

That liberal (Maixine Waters) is all about wrecking the U.S. economy. Goes to show how politicians act like spoiled little children, and with very little understanding of economics.

Needless to say, if Maxine has her way, we may as well get into the rickshaw business.

No responses yet

May 21 2008

Congress Contemplating Pulling a “Mugabe” to Hide Inflation

It didn’t take long for Congress to make an emphatic point that it does not understand the value of a free market, or for that matter, that it fails to comprehend the importance of a freely operating pricing mechanism. Said another way, Congress is proving its members to be the economic jackasses they’ve generally always tended to be.  In this case, some are attempting to disrupt the free flow of dollars into commodities — the same dollars whose supply were expanded at a decent clip over the last few decades.

The attempt at preventing the market place from determining the real price of commodities as dollars flood  from other, bloated priced items — real estate and related securities, financial equities, and less attractive, low interest rate debt — and into real, hard, tangible assets that are forced to be backed by labor and sacrifice as opposed the Wall Street alchemy, Ponzi finance, and the money printing press.  Robert Mugabe’s inflation in Zimbabwe clearly is far more dramatic abuse of a currency, but his policies to hide inflation are fundamentally no different.  He attempts to prevent price discovery as well, and the consequences he has will be what the U.S. can expect — earlier stages, of course, but dramatic nonetheless:  capital shifting to where it can find a true price vs. being hampered by centralized cover-up.

Yesterday Bloomberg began reporting that the Chairman of the Senate oversight committee, Joseph Lieberman, is considering legislation limiting what he defines as speculation in the commodities markets. While it is geared at preventing mostly larger players — hedge funds, and other institutional investors — from hedging in the commodities market, the effects of this proposal, should it be enacted, will cause shudders all the way down to the average person.

Mind you, we’ve been pointing out since the early part of this decade that Greenspan’s attempts at warding off the market crash and ensuing recession of 2001 would create severe dislocations in the economy as prices bubbled into new bubbles and economic activity would be distorted as the all elements of the economy restructured itself around what it perceived to be legitimate economic growth. Yet we were clear that this activity would serve only as a head-fake to the economy given it was rooted not in genuine growth, but rather through credit and monetary inflation — a process that rips wealth from the organic / functioning sections of the economy, reallocating it to the hot money, synthetic areas of the economy that can’t stand on their own absent the artificially created life support. With the collapse of the housing and credit markets, we’ve been proven about as correct as one can be — especially when compared to the supposedly reliable experts on Wall Street, at the Fed, and in Washington D.C. who were overwhelmingly blindsided by the collapse.

Says Lieberman:

“We may need to limit the opportunity people have to maximize their profits because a lot of the rest of us are paying through the nose, including some who can’t afford it.”

Meanwhile, Senator Claire McCaskill, Democrat of Missouri, is warning that the people are ready to reach for the Pitchforks. Well, let’s make sure they know who the real culprits are.  In short summary, here’s a few key reason why commodities are going up:

  • Too much money has been printed over the last few decades. The consequences of this were beneficial as they often are when the government and its sanctioned central banks (ala our Federal Reserve) inflate in the early stages in that some “nice” assets were inflated in price, such as stocks and bonds, and houses. Only, investors failed to make the connection that these bubbles, with bonds still in high gear, were inflationary.
  • The other benefit was a double edged sword: free trade.  While many lost there older, higher paying jobs in the United States, most Americans were only mildly inconvenienced as newly minted dollars were quickly vented off shore with the trade deficit.  All that wealth was invested by foreigners into vastly expanding low cost production capacity, and hence, the U.S. consumer benefitted as prices plummeted.  Were these dollars stuck in the United States, its high cost labor and cumbersome regulatory nonsense would have combined with the natural consequence of an increasing money supply facing a supply of goods and services growing at a dramatically slower pace.  Inflation would have strangled the economy pretty quickly.
  • All this foreign production and accumulation of wealth requires commodities to feed it. That demand is competing with the U.S. as supply has not increased so drmatically. Flush with U.S. dollars, trade partners are ever more willing to part with dollars to satiate their demand for commodities.
  • All those dollars are printed, and they exist in the economies of many countries across the globe. Most still remain invested in the Bond bubble, focusing heavily in the perceived safety of U.S. Treasuries. However, other U.S. bond assets, especially the once sturdy mortgage sector has imploded.   This, as commodities were gaining pretty much since 2002.  Since then, Sovereign State and Central Bank investors have been contemplating the problems of the dollar, and have begun braodening their positioning of new dollars in areas other than just bonds and equities.  Hello, commodities as an asset class.
  • More private and institutional Investors have been looking to diversify as well, with the most savvy having understood the nature of the inflation that took  place over the last twenty years and its contribution to a vast credit bubble that will require yet more inflation to support Wall Street investment banks. They’ve also noticed the U.S. government has a long term insolvency problem given politicians have promised the sun, moon, and stars at such a level that it will literally bankrupt the nation, and with that they expect politicians to to the politically surreptitious method of paying off things like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.  They’ll do it with freshly printed dollars vs. doubling taxes and cutting benefits by a third.  These savvy investors have diversified into commodities as a basic inflation hedge given they believe the die were long ago cast.
  • Other savvy investors expect foreign sovereigns to lose their appetite for U.S. debt at near 50 year low yields given they expect the emerging recession will be severe.  This will result in more commodity hedging / dumping of the dollar, they expect.   F
  • or decades we exported our inflation, and foreign nations gladly imported it for trade purposes. Now we will pay for it as foreigners slowly export it back to us.
  • Finally, Peak Oil theory has been right on, and this problem of decreasing light sweed crude supply means oil producers will be forced to retrieve harder to get and less easily refined resources vs. what so easily flowed for the past sixty years.  The quality of Saudi oil has been steadily decreasing suggesting that the Saudis are not so flush as in the past, further explaining their recent shift to preserve their resource for future generations of their own people (a trend emergin among all OPEC nations) vs. supplying the United States, which refuses to develop its own resources while it’s politicians, delusional as always, wag their fingers at the OPEC for not producing enough.
  • U.S. energy policy has been swamped by Green and NIMBY (not in my back yard) legislation that simply has caught up with the U.S. via higher priced energy.  Oil is a crucial factor in the production of everything, including fertilizer, transportation, and every single facet of production. As it goes up in price, invariably so will all else.  Nuclear energy has been virtually outlawed while many nations globally use it very safely.  Meanwhile, alternative energy has been a goal, but its still not viable technology.  NIMBY and environmental legislation hammers some of it, such as wind farms, which have been prohibited for killing some birds and making unsightly beach views.
  • Just in Time Delivery was dependent on low energy costs. Supply will be constrained as the economy rewires itself to slower delivery and larger inventories in order to lower costs.

So there you have it, and that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Congress can reshuffle the deck chairs and search to blame, blame, blame everyone but themselves and the private banking cartell they collude with called the Federal Reserve.  But inflation is catching up to us, and it the stupid legislation in the United States that made the U.S. too complicated for doing business, and its currency so common, well… that’s to blame.

That said, expect the politicians to distract from the real problems as they always do. They will, instead, look for politically popular scapegoats to help their re-election.

No responses yet

May 15 2008

Sowing the Seeds of Inflation and Dollar Degradation

“The Federal Reserve as other central banks is obviously taking onto its balance sheet a lot of mortgages these days.” “Well, the creators of the Federal Reserve system would be rolling over in their graves if they knew the Federal Reserve is buying mortgages.”
– Former Federal Reserve Chariman Paul Volcker

Whether or not the creators of the Fed would be rolling over in their graves is debatable in our opinion. Like Andrew Jackson — we believe central bankers have always been dangerous, incompetent meddlers. We feel the Fed should never have been created — and and that it continues to prove itself as bungling as any other central planning committee. But we digress…. That said, the former chairman’s grave concern over the central bank taking on billions of not so hot private debt is quite valid.

Volcker went on to warn that recent intervention by the Fed in securities markets might compromise it’s independence. He went on to say that the Fed’s inability to contain inflation will create a 1970’s like scenario. Again, he’s right there. We’ll also add, it’s too late Paul — the nationalization of the US private debt has begun. When politicians, who’s outlook is only as far as the next election — get involved, the trend will only accelerate. So to will corresponding inflation and Dollar degradation.

Beyond the blatant example of the Fed’s $30 Billion bailout of Bear Stearns — we now see Senator Christopher Dodd proposing the creation of an FHA program to insure refinanced mortgages following partial forgiveness of the loans by lenders. OK, let’s think about this. In an environment where U.S. foreclosures have risen 65% over the past year — and private banks/lenders are preferring to seize homes rather than renegotiate with already defaulting borrowers — the Federal Government is going to step in with money it does not have (but will be all to happy to print) — to back already bad debt.

Also, earlier this month, the Fed agreed to accept securities backed by student loans pledged as collateral for Treasuries the central bank would in turn lend to Wall Street Investment Banks. Let’s analyze that deal. Investors had become far less willing to finance student loan debt at pre-existing prices — due to liquidity issues, the economy, and the fact that consumers (including students) are hurting — and are therefore higher credit risks. The cost to finance such loans would have to naturally go up. Wall Street investment banks (you know, the ones who paid themselves billions in record bonuses over the past year) were less willing to hold onto securities they owned backed by this type of debt. However, if they tried to sell it — they would sell it for a loss. No worry, the Fed would lend/swap them Treasuries for the riskier (and worth far less) student loan backed securities.

Effectively, you have the government, or quasi government institutions backing substandard debt with money it will have to print. That spells one thing — accelerating inflation — and the always accompanying confiscation of private savings. And we’re not talking the low single digit inflation figure the government “calculates” (and bases Social Security payment increases on). We’re talking about the inflation you see in the supermarket ($4 for a handful of blueberries anybody?) — and at the gas pump.

When we hear the Treasury Secretary, or the Chairman of the Fed talk tough on inflation and defending the Dollar — we just smile. When we hear political candidates blaming oil companies and “speculators” for rising prices — we smile again.

We think the next 3-5 years will be quite interesting.

One response so far

Apr 17 2008

Bailouts, Inflation, and Dollar Destruction

“I think we were really on the verge of a financial collapse of unbelievable proportions that we haven’t seen since the 1930’s.”
– Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill describing the Bear Stearns bailout in an April 16, 2008 interview on Bloomberg

Read that quote again by Paul O’Neill – because, yep folks, that’s really where things stand. Our financial system effectively patched together by an inflationary, money printing band-aid. And, as the real estate markets in England, along with those in Spain, Ireland, et al. continue to melt down, we maintain our belief that the whole fiasco is far from over. (Our regular readers know we said the same when conventional pundits said the worst was over in 2007).

The interesting thing about economics is that people have been conditioned to believe in the charade that it is a mysterious, complex, science – and to be successful at understanding it, explaining it to the great unwashed, and at running large portfolios – one must be a superior mathematician educated at the most prestigious of universities. As we watch the same geniuses educated at said universities – some of whom had supposedly developed mathematical models which had eradicated risk – continue to drive hedge funds (and at least one major Wall Street brokerage firm) valued in the $ billions straight over the cliff – we say – “oh really?”

We instead choose to take Harry Truman’s quote — “There is nothing new in the world but the history you do not know” – to heart when we look at economics. History is in fact the study of human behavior – of what has worked, and what has failed. To ignore historical facts one must be either arrogant, a fool – or an arrogant fool. So, as Sir Alan Greenspan and his knights at the Fed Round Table repeatedly cut rates earlier this decade – we warned that the unfolding scenario looked a whole lot like Japan in the 1980’s and 90’s! A Stock market bubble, followed by a stock market crash – and subsequent economic pain. Then came massive interest rate cuts to supposedly “stimulate” – which instead caused a real estate bubble – followed by a real estate collapse, and a severe, prolonged recession.

Sound familiar?

What next? We see the bailouts continuing — simply because the alternative is the severe and necessary corrective pain to clean out the mess and get prices of all things back in line. And what politician, Wall Street banker, investor, or voter wants to deal with that reality? And bailouts spell inflation. Not the fudged low-ball inflation that’s used to calculate Social Security payment increases or “official” economic growth. We’re talking about real inflation. The rapidly rising kind you are seeing at the supermarket and the gas pump on a daily basis. As these inflationary bailouts continue – look for prices of all things tangible to increase dramatically.

Commodities bubble? We think not – because bubbles require excessive stockpiles/inventory/supply – and we don’t see that at all – in anything. And we see inflationary (money printing/bailout) policies accelerating.

Oil at $125 in the near future anyone? $5 Dollar gas at the end of the year? Food prices continuing through the roof? It would not surprise us at all.

No responses yet

Mar 26 2008

Your Money Backs More Bad Debt

Regulators “are playing with fire,” said Allan Meltzer, a Fed historian and economics professor at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. “With good luck, none of these liabilities will come due. We can’t expect that good luck, and we haven’t had it.”
– Bloomberg (March 26, 2008)

The reason you want solid collateral to secure a loan is obvious. You want to protect adequately against the borrower’s potential inability to pay you the loan back. How interesting that the Fed is taking 30 $ Billion of illiquid mortgage securities as collateral from otherwise insolvent Bear Stearns to bail the Wall Street firm out. As intriguing (alarming) — is the Treasury’s encouragement of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to buy more mortgage-backed bonds.

We ask — who in their right mind would lend out their own money backed by such risky collateral? Who today would buy mortgage backed bonds with their own money?

Ah, there lies the rub! It’s not their money which backs these shenanigans – it yours!

No responses yet

Mar 21 2008

Bailout Junkies

We’ve continually warned about the bailout addicted U.S. Another voice of clarity and reason all along has been Bill Fleckenstein. As usual, he nails it in his latest commentary, “Catering to the Bailout Nation.” BTW, Bill’s recently released book Greenspan’s Bubbles: The Age of Ignorance at the Federal Reserve – is definitely worth a read! We wonder — has anyone ever been un-knighted? Can they do that?

Any reasonable person knows that bailouts beget more (and larger) bailouts. Like a drunk having another drink, it’s just going to make the hangover (and resulting inflation) even worse.

Also, ask yourself this one – why are big Wall Street banks getting bailed out (with taxpayer money) – when the 5 largest recently paid themselves 39 $Billion in bonuses?

Think long and hard about the answer to that one – because you are paying for it – in overt taxes, and the great hidden tax – accelerating real inflation.

No responses yet

Mar 18 2008

The “Big Rip-Off” continues…

With today’s 75 basis point rate cut – we see continued evidence as to whom the Fed really serves. As we have long said, it’s not you and I – it’s the Big Wall Street Banks. The “Big Rip-Off” of your savings continues. Jon Markman gets right down to it…

No responses yet

Mar 17 2008

How Ugly? Great Depression Ugly!

A list of articles worth perusing to grasp the depth of our problems:

No responses yet

Mar 07 2008

Super Genius Hedge Funds Dropping Like Flies

Well… Hedge funds were supposed to be the super geniuses for the mega rich… and then downward they trickled to the filthy rich, and then the super rich, and eventually the rich, the neveau riche and the Me-Tooue Riche.  Well, we said last summer when Bear Stearns blew up that none of these super geniuses were getting it, and we’ve been saying that before and since. Just read our archives and don’t buy that “nobody saw it coming” rubbish because that’s a half-assed excuse for neglect, hubris, vast volumes of conceit (at those pointing out this inevitability) and downright greed. So here we are.

At what point the conventional wisdom shifts in this country to comprehend how severe the U.S. and Global economic situation is is unknown to us. Until then, read the cards: You can weep, or you can play ‘em right. Your Choice.

In the meantime, all those who jollied around using the contemptuous term “tin foil hat wearing crowd” when describing publications like ours… Well, we hope you’ve not gone and just lost your shirt. Good luck at exiting your trades.

As for their victims… So very sorry… You could have listened.  Will you learn?

Think. Don’t Sink.

No responses yet

Mar 06 2008

Things Turn Ugly for U.S. Consumers

We’ve been exceptionally busy with our real careers (that don’t involve writing) which you can imagine is keeping us from doing as much writing given what’s transpiring in the economy and markets as we speak.

What?  You haven’t heard?   Well, here’s a list.  And for those of you looking for answers, please just leaf back through the past few months of our writing and you’ll have a good idea of not only what, but why this is happening — as well as some serious insight about vigilant thinking for your future.  If you can’t take the time to investigate, well… You have only one other choice!

That said, here’s our list of current crisis points, victims, et. al. with some occasional commentary:

U.S. Unexpectedly Lost 63,000 Jobs in February - Bloomberg (03/07/2008 07:45 AM)

This should come as no surprise to anyone.   The job numbers, while rigged to carry momentum on the upside long after prior real job growth dissipates, eventually fall under the weight of the prevailing trend.  Our trend is hardly filled with light winds:  housing, the primary driving sector of the pre bubble break economy, has been jettisoning jobs faster than a drug runner dumps his stash when pursued by the Feds.  Those figures have simply not been getting a real voice, while at the same time the essence of the unemployment stat is also somewhat fictitious.  What do you call someone of able body and mind who does not have a job?  Well, if he’s not looking for work, he’s not unemployed — he’s “discouraged.”  Real unemployment by the standards used back when stats were less fiddled with (e.g. during the depression when unemployment was 25%) is closer to 13%.  Expect that to worsen.

Consumers can only go on for so long before they buckle.   That’s a problem when you’re economic policy is built on the foundation of sand that is consumption rather than savings.   So many other shoes are readying to drop. Look out. Be careful.

2 responses so far

Feb 15 2008

The Upside Down Thinking of Bursting Economic Bubbles

“The more optimistic they were under the illusory prosperity of the boom, the greater is their despair and their feeling of frustration. The individual is always ready to ascribe his good luck to his own efficiency and to take it as a well-deserved reward for his talent, application and probity. But reverses of fortune he always charges to other people, and most of all to the absurdity of social and political institutions. He does not blame the authorities for having fostered the boom. He reviles them for the inevitable collapse.”~ Ludwig von Mises, Human Action, p. 576

That’s a big problem today. Everyone loves the big party that is ginned up by easy credit and expanding money supply. What they fail to understand is that the bust is the essential, corrective phase to the massive clustering of bad business and investment errors that were encouraged by misguided economic policy. Granted, it’s a painful process, but necessary to restore sound economic health.

But the illusion of knowledge leads most participants to fight the correction tooth and nail, and to support policies that redirect whatever productive assets remain working for the economy towards supporting the exposed, unsustainable activity of the prior bubble.

At best this is a temporary fix, and is no more sustainable or a lasting solution than is giving an addict suffering the symptoms of withdrawal another dose of the drug to which he’s addicted.    Just like the addict, our economic reality must be embraced for what it is or else that reality will be unceremoniously forced on our citizens, except with them having even less control over the situation as punishment for the extra delay.

Unfortunately we’re in the latter stages of our addiction to credit and easy money.   The economy staggered out of the dot com bubble and was going to recession to restore order, but Alan Greenspan and crew short circuited that recovery, and as dramatic an increase in credit and money as ever was injected into the economy to keep it on its feet.   A new, far larger bubble replaced the old one in technology, one that applied to all things related to credit.  As such, another dose to ward off our current withdrawal may simply send the patient reeling into the gutter of an overdose.

Does that sound too extreme? Tell me, then, what purpose dose it serve to keep asset prices with no basis in reality artificially high vs. clearing at a natural, free market price?

Why keep assets at values that are entirely dependent upon expanding credit rather than genuine economic productivity — credit that itself comes at the expense of the productive sector given it is created by inflation? Why not let normal economic order be restored?

Why enable a system that clearly cannot sustain itself without garnering purchasing power from the functioning economy to continue the ruse?

These are all questions that are answered quite simply if honest:   Because going through withdrawal is a real bitch, but the only way to pay for ones past economic sins.

But, as Mises notes, rather than embrace the bust as the restoration of economic healthy as anyone organizing an intervention with a real drug addict, contemporary finance pros and populist sentiment alike clamor for more of drug that got us into this nasty spot in the first place.  Party On!
All said, any short term benefits derived from policy that merely reallocates existing wealth through inflationary confiscation / bailouts and reallocates it in order to support all the errors exposed as unsustainable over the last 12 months, will have long term, unhealthful  consequences as yet more burden is placed on the legitimate producing economy to support ever more garish malinvestment.

Stay Vigilant, and Think it Through!

No responses yet

Jan 28 2008

60 Minutes: House of Cards

How bad is it for housing? 60 Minutes provides a decent postmortem on the entry into the housing crash… If only they could haven warned people when it mattered –before it collapsed, like we did! The only thing missing is any revelation of where all this easy money came from. That answer is the Rosetta Stone of where we are in this crisis.

This piece truly puts a visual on the breadth of this crisis. One gentleman walking Steve Kroft through foreclosed properties when, towards the end of the piece, he thinks we’re lucky if we’re through the first 40% of this. Too bad the problem will not remain contained only to housing. As the monoline insurers backing many of the bonds continue to run into liquidity issues (e.g. Ambac, MBIA, and ACA Financial Guarantee) collide with the emerging problems in commercial and retail real estate, as well as those coming to the surface in revolving credit — credit cards, auto loans, etc. — we think 40% is a bit too optimistic.

As Jim Grant points out about all the assurances that this situation would remain “contained in subprimes,” and then “to just housing,” at best we can expect this will remain contained to planet earth.

2 responses so far

Jan 15 2008

Woe is the U.S. Economy — and to anyone who still buys into the false economic paradigm.

We’ve been hammering on this long before we started Vigilant Investor in April of 2005. Our primary theme: The U.S. Economy has been operating on a false paradigm that would catch up to it and result in serious pain.

Yet now we learn that Moody’s — smarting from loss of credibility due to reckless ratings in the mortgage backed debt market, and scrambling to regain face without exacerbating the problems it helped enable — is warning the U.S. it needs to scale back its roaring costs of entitlement. Surprised? Not if you’ve been a regular reader of Vigilant Investor or read the Ernharth Group 2007 wealth report.

Yet many intra industry types have mocked us and those like us, smugly laughing off our warnings as ridiculous, which today only serves to indict the paradigm in which the majority of people have been operating. Some even said we were cranks because our warnings lacked economics degrees, which only serves to remind me of the admonishments 10 years ago from the mainstream press, that folks like Matt Drudge were implicitly unreliable because they lacked journalism degrees.

Here we are today with a great majority of the most pertinent news and analysis coming not from the mainstream press, but from alternative sources like ours!

Yet if you have any doubts, consider the mistakes of the popular pundits, economists, and policy makers:

  1. They failed to grasp there was a housing bubble.
  2. They dismissed that it would impact the credit markets, let alone the economy.
  3. They asserted subprime problems would remain contained.
  4. They believed the market plummet of February 2007 was a one off event, indicating nothing more serious.
  5. They believed the subprime market was too small to be a contagion for the credit markets.
  6. They were bottom feeding on mortgage brokers and other financial companies in March of 2007 under the banner “The Worst is Over”
  7. They were doubling-down bottom feeding on those same stocks in August following the collapse in June and July that finally exposed the problem as very serious.
  8. They were promoting soft landing scenarios in September 2007
  9. They continue to promote “the worst is over” type assessments, believing Fed liquidity will solve the problem.
  10. They believe, if any mistake was made, it was the Fed failed to come to the rescue with more liquidity in time to help out.

So, the question is, do you still believe them?

We admit we’re patting ourselves on the back, but we do so only to remind our readers that they need to seriously be thinking through this environment in the context that the majority of players have been operating under the delusions of a false paradigm.

How do we know? Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Next »